As we worked on the solution, and it became more elaborate with implementation feeding back to experience and ixd etc, we put it aside to work on a seemingly unrelated concept.
Turns out, that the newer concept, views, was our solution to groups. And in reflection it was a great example of an interactional approach trumping an informational one. (see http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1094570 for more on that lovely theory)
What I also found interesting, both then and now, is that a physically engaging experience helped to surface this conceptual link between our work and the work of Boehner et al.
Enaction privileges an interactional perspective? Maybe. Worth looking at.
